News + Media
In the NewsJune 18, 2020Modi denies any Indian territory was lost in China clashThe Associated PressThe New York TimesM Taylor Fravel quoted: From a strategic perspective, Fravel said, China should want to drive a wedge between India and the United States to prevent any kind of counter-balance coalition. "The deaths and the clash on Monday night will probably very quickly and much more rapidly push India closer to the United States, which I think is probably not what China wants,” he said. |
|
In the NewsJune 18, 2020Modi finds neighbors silent as India-China tensions simmerArchana Chaudhary and Bibhudatta PradhanBloombergVipin Narang quoted: “The optimistic view is that the tragic loss of life will incentivize both governments to energize their efforts to resolve the border dispute,” said Vipin Narang, associate professor of political science at MIT and author of ‘Nuclear Strategy in the Modern Era: Regional Powers and International Conflict.’ “The pessimistic view is that China has no intention of relieving the pressure that it is putting across the entire Line of Actual Control and that this is a long way from being over.” |
|
In the NewsJune 17, 2020A watershed moment in India-China relations, says MIT's Vipin NarangKaushik VaidyaBloomberg | QuintVipin Narang was interviewed and heavily quoted in this article about the "violent face-off" in the Galwan Valley on Monday night in which 20 Indian armymen were killed in action. The political mood over the next several days in both countries will be critical he says. |
|
In the NewsJune 17, 2020India and China trade barbs after ‘gang war’ high in the HimalayasJoanna Slater and Gerry ShihThe Washington PostM Taylor Fravel quoted: China probably has “little interest in further escalation,” said M Taylor Fravel, an expert on the People’s Liberation Army who heads the Security Studies Program at MIT. “China’s main competitor in East Asia and beyond is the United States, not India.” |
|
In the NewsJune 17, 2020Himalayan flashpoint could spiral out of control as India and China face offJulian BorgerThe GuardianVipin Narang quoted: “Now domestic politics and public opinion, especially nationalist pressure to avenge their deaths and escalate, becomes a dangerous force,” Vipin Narang, a security studies professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said. “It will be hard for India at least, with a relatively open media, to de-escalate as easily now.” |
|
In the NewsJune 17, 2020Ladakh face-off | China’s Foreign Minister blames India ‘for deliberately provoking’ border clashAnanth KrishnanThe HinduTaylor Fravel quoted: China was unlikely to confirm the number, said M Taylor Fravel, an expert on the Chinese military at MIT. “I can think of no armed conflict involving China where it has released casualty figures publicly at the time of the conflict,” he said. “Usually, they are published years or decades later,” he noted on Twitter, pointing out that casualties from the 1962 were only revealed for the first time in an internal history published in 1994. |
|
In the NewsJune 16, 2020North Korea blows up joint liaison office with SouthRobin YoungWBUR Here & NowNorth Korea blew up an inter-Korean liaison office building just north of the heavily armed border with South Korea on Tuesday. The dramatic display of anger sharply raises tensions on the Korean Peninsula, and puts pressure on Washington and Seoul amid deadlocked nuclear diplomacy. Host Robin Young speaks with security analyst Jim Walsh about the implications. |
|
In the NewsJune 16, 2020India-China clash: An extraordinary escalation 'with rocks and clubs'Soutik BiswasBBC NewsVipin Narang quoted: "It is looking bad, very bad," says security analyst Vipin Narang, of the deadly clash between Indian and Chinese soldiers in Ladakh on Monday night. The most serious face-off on the world's longest unsettled land border in nearly half a century left 20 Indian soldiers dead. India says both sides suffered casualties. "Once fatalities are sustained, keeping everything quiet becomes hard on both sides. Now public pressure becomes a variable," Dr Narang, a security studies professor at MIT, told me. "The scale, scope and swathe of the pressure across the border is seemingly unprecedented." |
|
In the NewsJune 12, 2020Russia, China and the US: Who has the best Middle East policy?Dale SprusanskyWashington Report on Middle East Affairs, June/July 2020, pp 58-59The Middle East Institute held an online discussion with two renowned scholars of international affairs on April 16 to assess the role of the US, China and Russia in the Middle East, which included SSP's Barry Posen. Here is a recap with some highlights and quotes from the event. |
|
In the NewsJune 12, 2020Two years after Trump-Kim meeting, little to show for personal diplomacyDavid E Sanger and Choe Sang-HunThe New York TimesVipin Narang quoted: “Trump has told himself this was a win, and so has Kim,” said Vipin Narang. “Trump keeps repeating, ‘There wasn’t a war.’” “For Kim Jong-un it was also a win because he is able to take the air out of the maximum pressure campaign” to crush the country economically, he said, “while he is still expanding his missile and nuclear force.” |